Although I agree with the editorial praising the new James Webb Space Telescope (Our View, Sept. 13), I would like to quibble with one of the points the editorial board makes. (Call me a nit-picker.)

The board writes that if the telescope had not worked as planned, it would have been “a historic boondoggle.” The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang defines a “boondoggle” as “an extravagant and useless project.”

If the James Webb Space Telescope had failed, it surely would have been an unfortunate failure, not a “boondoggle.”

Harold McWilliams
Rockport

Copy the Story Link

« Previous

Letter to the editor: LePage’s lack of vision cost Maine clean-energy opportunity

Next »

Letter to the editor: Gov. Mills invests in Mainers’ education