A sea turtle swims over corals on Moore Reef in Gunggandji Sea Country off the coast of Queensland in eastern Australia in 2022. The International Seabed Authority on March 31 closed two weeks’ worth of negotiations without reaching any agreement or consensus on the issue amid growing calls to pause, ban or place a moratorium on the potential deep-sea mining of minerals used in green technology like electric car batteries. Sam McNeil/ Associated Press, file

Delegates to the U.N.-affiliated organization that regulates seabed mining cut a live stream of their negotiations Wednesday and retreated behind closed doors in an attempt to resolve a dilemma that could determine the fate of the deep ocean.

The International Seabed Authority missed a deadline on July 9 to enact regulations to allow the mining of deep sea ecosystems for valuable metals used in electric-car batteries. That means the authority must accept license applications from mining companies. But the question of whether it must act – and how – on any submissions in the absence of environmental safeguards has stymied the Council, the authority’s 36-member policymaking body that has been meeting at the ISA’s Kingston, Jamaica, headquarters for the past two weeks.

While delegates negotiated out of sight, observers from environmental groups huddled in conversation outside the Council chambers at the Jamaica Conference Center, a sort of tropical United Nations. Louisa Casson, a Greenpeace campaigner, worries a compromise could commit the ISA to reviewing mining license applications by a certain date even if regulations still aren’t in place.

“It would be outrageous for negotiators here to cook up a deal that sets a start date for this risky industry,” Casson said. (As of Wednesday night, no deal was announced.)

The authority is perhaps the world’s most unusual international institution, with extraordinary powers to determine the future of the deep ocean, the world’s last untouched wilderness. Pushed by Nauru, a tiny Pacific island nation, and an investor-backed seabed mining venture, the ISA this month is continuing to negotiate regulations that could allow mining to begin.

The 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of Sea created the authority to promote the exploitation of the seabed in international waters for the benefit of humankind while, seemingly contradictorily, ensuring the effective protection of the marine environment. The treaty also directed the authority to establish the Enterprise, a for-profit corporation to mine the seabed and share revenue and technology with developing nations. In other words, the authority will regulate its own company.

For decades, the ISA had toiled away out of sight and out of mind, writing rules for an industry that seemed far in the future. This week, as extreme climate-driven heat waves broil the planet’s biosphere, the regulations’ final details are still being hammered out – and could go into effect as early as next year. Now, though, the world’s watching.

A growing number of the authority’s 168 member nations (plus the European Union) are calling for a moratorium or pause on deep sea mining because of a severe lack of scientific knowledge about the seabed ecosystems targeted for exploitation. (The ISA has issued 31 licenses to mining contractors to explore the seabed for minerals but none are yet allowed to start mining.) Environmental activists, meanwhile, are pressuring corporations to pledge not to use or finance seabed minerals lest they have the blood of otherworldly seabed-dwelling critters like “Casper” the ghost octopus on their hands.

For a few weeks each year, Kingston is transformed into a diplomatic hub as hundreds of member-state delegates, NGO observers and mining contractors descend on the capital, whisked from their hotels to the authority’s harbor-side headquarters by a police escort that barrels through city streets, lights flashing and sirens blaring. But escalating controversy has disrupted the authority’s clubby atmosphere, where the annual meetings long had the air of a family reunion.

Matthew Gianni, co-founder of an alliance of environmental groups called the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, recalled weekend retreats at a Jamaican resort where ISA participants would mingle. “People really did socialize – contractors dancing with NGOs, NGOs with delegates,” he said. “Nobody was really taking strong positions on things back then and the negotiations were fairly easygoing.”

The first ISA meeting I attended was in 2017. I was the only journalist there, and back then, mining the seafloor still seemed a decade or more away. There were cocktail receptions on the lush grounds of the British High Commission and gathering at the hilltop estate of the secretary general’s official residence.

The vibe was decidedly different when I walked into the ISA on Monday for the first time since the pandemic. Armed security guards and police roamed the building and media were only permitted to attend one week of the three-week session and barred from the meeting chamber when delegates are in session.

Tensions have been rising since 2021 when Nauru triggered a rule requiring mining regulations to be enacted within two years. That focused global attention on the authority and its closeness to the mining contractors it regulates. Nauru is the ISA state sponsor of the Metals Co., a Canadian-registered firm, and it invoked the two-year provision shortly after executives told potential investors they expected to begin mining in 2024. That started a countdown to finish a complex set of regulations that had been the works for more than five years.

Temperatures at the Authority are likely to rise in the final two days of the Council session this week as delegates try to resolve what to do about mining applications. At the same time, they’re trying to come to terms on regulations that involve everything from setting royalties on mining revenue and how to share them among member states to establishing environmental inspection and compliance procedures.

The ISA Assembly, which comprises all member states, meets next week. Although it is the authority’s final arbiter and usually approves the Council’s decisions, mining opponents plan to take their case to the assembly’s 169 members. Chile, France, Palau and Vanuatu have submitted a proposal to the assembly to prohibit the approval of any mining licenses until regulations are enacted.