In an era of cost-cutting undertaken by business entities, The Forecaster should seriously consider eliminating John Balentine’s “Here’s Something” column and, thereafter, provide a portion of the cost-saving(s) to a local food bank. Why am I so harsh? The preparation of his weekly column does not require any research or original observations/thoughts, i.e., no “deep dive” into the facts and details required to enlighten his audience, but instead, he offers the reader a “belly flop” on the surface of any subject under discussion. Am I the only one critical of his research prowess? No. A recent letter to the editor (“Reader’s pet peeve is pundit’s propaganda,” Sept. 4), written by Susan Chichetto of Bath, stated, “I decided to grade Mr. Balentine’s latest English essay … I gave him an F for research.”
Will Mr. Balentine undertake any research at all to enhance his knowledge of the subject under examination? Yes, he will. However, his usual preference is a “deep dive” into the Republican Party playbook and Fox News summaries, as a means to provide the questions and answers to any subject he is willing to put forward. Unfortunately, these biased sources can never replace a thorough placement of all facts and details from many reliable places before his audience required to fully understand a complicated issue.
Therefore, by eliminating John Balentine’s weekly column, The Forecaster can provide much-needed resources to a community food bank, while saving some money. The individuals who receive this wonderful gift will thank The Forecaster for its splendid generosity.
John M. Mishler
Harpswell
Comments are not available on this story.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
